Quick academic help
Don't let the stress of school get you down! Have your essay written by a professional writer before the deadline arrives.
Thomas Aquinas' Cosmological Argument
Despite cultural differences, broadly speaking, humans worldwide have a vague idea of what is right and what is wrong; a moral argument for the existence of God would say that this mutual understanding is proof of God's existence.
If the argument from structure to design is convincing when drawn from a particular animal, say a Newfoundland dog, and is not weakened by the knowledge that this dog came from similar parents, would it be at all weakened if it were ascertained that he was a remote descendant of the mastiff or some other breed, or that both these and other breeds came (as is suspected) from some wolf? If not, how is the argument for design in the structure of our particular dog affected by the supposition that his wolfish progenitor came from a post-tertiary wolf, perhaps less unlike an existing one that the dog in question is to some other of the numerous existing races of dogs, and that this post-tertiary came from an equally or more different tertiary wolf? And if the argument from structure to design is not invalidated by our present knowledge that our individual dog was developed from a single organic cell, how is it invalidated by the supposition of an analogous natural descent, through a long line of connected forms, from such a cell, or from some simple animal, existing ages before there were any dogs?
The cosmological argument is basically an argument about causation.
The Argument from Design purports to demonstrate the existence of God by citing as evidence the appearance of design or purpose in the natural world. This argument differs from the others we have considered in that it does not depend on any exotic or potentially controversial metaphysical assumptions. The ontological argument assumes as a premise that existence is a perfection; the cosmological argument assumes that every positive fact must have an explanation. And whatever else one thinks of these arguments, their appeal is limited precisely because the rational atheist or agnostic seems to be entirely within his rights in resisting these assumptions. The Argument from Design, by contrast, appeals only to evident facts of experience and to a principle of reasoning that seems to be firmly embedded in ordinary common sense and in scientific thinking.
Hume criticizes the Argument from Design in his (best known as his essay on miracles) but his most completeanalysis is in , published shortlyafter his death in 1776.
Therefore I am defending the existence of God.
The teleological argument, also known as the argument from design quite simply states that a designer must exist since the universe and living things display elements of design in their order, consistency, unity and pattern.
Part IX Demea argues that since arguments are inconclusive, the only way to go is an declaration of faith. Cleanthes points out that the usefulness of anapproach doesn't make it valid, then, to anticipate Philo's arguments, attemptsto show that one cannot demonstrate the existence of God .
Why choose our assistance?
As soon as we have completed your work, it will be proofread and given a thorough scan for plagiarism.
Our clients' personal information is kept confidential, so rest assured that no one will find out about our cooperation.
We write everything from scratch. You'll be sure to receive a plagiarism-free paper every time you place an order.
We will complete your paper on time, giving you total peace of mind with every assignment you entrust us with.
Want something changed in your paper? Request as many revisions as you want until you're completely satisfied with the outcome.
We're always here to help you solve any possible issue. Feel free to give us a call or write a message in chat.
There are really only two arguments in favor of the existence of God.
Part IV Cleanthes demolishes Demea by pointing out that a mind which hasno thought is not a mind, and a view of God that makes him utterly unknowable isnot very different from atheism. Philo, meanwhile, has caught his breath andwades back in. He attacks the idea of reasoning from earthly particulars to theuniverse as a whole, and pretty well lays out the modern skeptical opposition tothe Argument from Design, asking why, if ideas in God's mind organize themselveswithout cause, why matter couldn't do the same thing. Cleanthes retorts that,regardless of Philo's "abstruse doubts, cavils and objections," thechain of inference from order to designer is too clear and straightforward todoubt.
The argument from reason is an ontological argument....
Part V Philo fires a broadside against Cleanthes. He points out that thethen-new discoveries in astronomy and under the microscope undermine Cleanthesby making the universe less and less like human design. He points out thathumans are in no better position to judge whether the universe is well designedthan an illiterate peasant is to evaluate the Aeneid. He argues that we have noway of knowing whether the universe might not be the work of a team of deities,or perhaps a discarded trial run [positions that run counter to orthodoxChristianity, of course, but not to the idea of intelligent design]. Cleanthes replies that not one of thesearguments successfully refutes the fact of design itself.
Most of these arguments can be termed as ontological.
This essay purposefully attempts to break down Paley’s argument and does so in the following manner: firstly, Paley’s basis for the teleological argument is introduced; secondly, Paley’s argument is derived and analyzed; thirdly, the connection between Paley’s argument and th...
The main point in the cosmological argument is the first cause.
Sotnak analyzes "some of the more common manifestations" of the teleological argument, including those of Hume and Plantinga, finding that the argument "fails to make it even probable that living things were designed." From Appendix of (1995) by .
How it works
You submit your order instructions
We assign an appropriate expert
The expert takes care of your task
We send it to you upon completion
Average quality score
"I have always been impressed by the quick turnaround and your thoroughness. Easily the most professional essay writing service on the web."
"Your assistance and the first class service is much appreciated. My essay reads so well and without your help I'm sure I would have been marked down again on grammar and syntax."
"Thanks again for your excellent work with my assignments. No doubts you're true experts at what you do and very approachable."
"Very professional, cheap and friendly service. Thanks for writing two important essays for me, I wouldn't have written it myself because of the tight deadline."
"Thanks for your cautious eye, attention to detail and overall superb service. Thanks to you, now I am confident that I can submit my term paper on time."
"Thank you for the GREAT work you have done. Just wanted to tell that I'm very happy with my essay and will get back with more assignments soon."